• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

How to Avoid Being Banned

dandan

New Member
arg-fallbackName="dandan"/>
A few weeks ago my account under the user name "LEROY" was banned for no reason. I didn’t violate any of the rules .

All I did was exposing a contradiction made by hackenslash,


I personally enjoy this forum and I have learned a few things, many of my views have been modified due to conversations that I have had in the forum.

Given that I didn’t violate any of the current rules. I simply what to know which rules should I follow to avoid being banned in the future
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
I very rarely support banning, but the idea you did nothing wrong is so laughably distant from any form of reality one would need to be literally insane to agree.

Fuck off LEROY.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
As usual, LEROY playing his silly games.

Here's the ban post:

http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2
australopithecus said:
Because Leroy aka Back aka DanDan couldn’t be bothered to wait 2 weeks for his ban to expire that ban will no longer expire.

Pay your respects as seems best to you.

The rules LEROY absolutely didn't violate:

http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2

Breaking the rules will result in a caution and thread-lock. Repeat offenses will be met with a permanent ban. You have been warned.
Strict guidelines:-

DO NOT post racist, sexist or homophobic remarks.
DO NOT bully other users or make physical threats.
DO NOT post links to or discuss illegal downloads.
DO NOT disseminate other users' personal information.
DO NOT post pornographic material (or anything that could be seen as such).
DO NOT post spam.
DO NOT advertise services or products for sale (unless given permission).


General tips:-

Be civil and polite to other users, even when you really disagree with them! Mutual respect is important.
Do not create huge signatures with lines of images. It means more scrolling, and that's not fair on our poor mouse wheels and trackpads. If your sig is any bigger than the one on this post, it's too big. If your sig disappears, it was deleted for being too big. If you repost it, you'll annoy other users and the mods. This will result in an eSlap.
If a thread is clearly going to be locked, don't spam it with remarks like "This thread is going to be locked". You're just bumping a crappy thread.
If you're not sure where something should go, post it in General Discussion.
You aren't a moderator, and acting like one isn't cool.
You can swear all you like, but targeting abuse at an individual will be treated as bullying.
Ban jumping when temp banned will lead to a permenant ban. Don’t be an idiot.
Make your thread titles relevant to the content.
Search the forums before posting news articles to cut down on copypasta.
If you want a thread to be stickied, include "Sticky please" in the title. If it doesn't get stickied, it isn't worthy. Deal with it.
If you feel your thread is NSFW, warn people in the title.
Think before you do anything illegal. We will work with the authorities for great justice.
Generally being excessively crude, irritating or attempting to troll for lulz may get you banned at the discretion of the moderators. Respect their decisions, they are only enforcing the rules. You can appeal a ban, but we will be checking logs to assess your offense, so don't try to lie about it.


So, as it clearly says: evading a temporary ban (a limited suspension) will result in a permanent ban.

Nothing wrong except that explicit thing he did wrong, was specifically indicted for, and which is clearly written in the rules as necessarily resulting in a permanent ban! :roll: :lol:

How LEROY.
 
arg-fallbackName="dandan"/>
Sparhafoc said:
I very rarely support banning, but the idea you did nothing wrong is so laughably distant from any form of reality one would need to be literally insane to agree.

.


Care to provide an example of me doing something wrong (worthy of being banned?)


Just kidding, we all know that you won’t provide any example,
 
arg-fallbackName="dandan"/>
Sparhafoc said:
As usual, LEROY playing his silly games.

Here's the ban post:

http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2
australopithecus said:
Because Leroy aka Back aka DanDan couldn’t be bothered to wait 2 weeks for his ban to expire that ban will no longer expire.

Pay your respects as seems best to you.

The rules LEROY absolutely didn't violate:

http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2

Breaking the rules will result in a caution and thread-lock. Repeat offenses will be met with a permanent ban. You have been warned.
Strict guidelines:-

DO NOT post racist, sexist or homophobic remarks.
DO NOT bully other users or make physical threats.
DO NOT post links to or discuss illegal downloads.
DO NOT disseminate other users' personal information.
DO NOT post pornographic material (or anything that could be seen as such).
DO NOT post spam.
DO NOT advertise services or products for sale (unless given permission).


General tips:-

Be civil and polite to other users, even when you really disagree with them! Mutual respect is important.
Do not create huge signatures with lines of images. It means more scrolling, and that's not fair on our poor mouse wheels and trackpads. If your sig is any bigger than the one on this post, it's too big. If your sig disappears, it was deleted for being too big. If you repost it, you'll annoy other users and the mods. This will result in an eSlap.
If a thread is clearly going to be locked, don't spam it with remarks like "This thread is going to be locked". You're just bumping a crappy thread.
If you're not sure where something should go, post it in General Discussion.
You aren't a moderator, and acting like one isn't cool.
You can swear all you like, but targeting abuse at an individual will be treated as bullying.
Ban jumping when temp banned will lead to a permenant ban. Don’t be an idiot.
Make your thread titles relevant to the content.
Search the forums before posting news articles to cut down on copypasta.
If you want a thread to be stickied, include "Sticky please" in the title. If it doesn't get stickied, it isn't worthy. Deal with it.
If you feel your thread is NSFW, warn people in the title.
Think before you do anything illegal. We will work with the authorities for great justice.
Generally being excessively crude, irritating or attempting to troll for lulz may get you banned at the discretion of the moderators. Respect their decisions, they are only enforcing the rules. You can appeal a ban, but we will be checking logs to assess your offense, so don't try to lie about it.


So, as it clearly says: evading a temporary ban (a limited suspension) will result in a permanent ban.

Nothing wrong except that explicit thing he did wrong, was specifically indicted for, and which is clearly written in the rules as necessarily resulting in a permanent ban! :roll: :lol:

How LEROY.

I am talking about my original (not permanent) ban.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
dandan said:
Sparhafoc said:
I very rarely support banning, but the idea you did nothing wrong is so laughably distant from any form of reality one would need to be literally insane to agree.

.


Care to provide an example of me doing something wrong (worthy of being banned?)


Just kidding, we all know that you won’t provide any example,


We all know you're a worthless troll who's not worth a wazz.

Not one person on this forum would be sad to see you disappear.

In fact, the moment you were banned, you were collectively forgotten.

You've reaped what you sow.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
dandan said:
I am talking about my original (not permanent) ban.

Fuck off LEROY

This is why you got banned, so as much as you might think you can troll your way around this as usual, your claim that you were clean as driven snow is shown to be bullshit as all your sniveling lies are.

You got a temporary ban for being a vicious little cunt, then a permanent ban for shoving your hand up a sockpuppet to evade your temp ban. Once the mods come back, this first troll account will be banned too.

At this point, I advocate for you being treated like that other vicious loser Bernie and having all your posts deleted. One click, and the gnat has departed the bull station.
 
arg-fallbackName="*SD*"/>
Ok, it looks to me like a decision (by the mods) needs to be made as to whether leroy's new(er) account is allowed to remain active or not. Seeing as I'm not a bullshitter, or the type to sneak around behind anyone's back, I'll state here that I've PM'd Gnug, as he was online a few minutes ago to ask this exact question. Or rather make the suggestion that a decision needs to be made. I'll not address dandan until it's clear as to whether his account is allowed to remain active.

Just my chippings.
 
arg-fallbackName="dandan"/>
Sparhafoc said:
dandan said:
I am talking about my original (not permanent) ban.

Fuck off LEROY

This is why you got banned, so as much as you might think you can troll your way around this as usual, your claim that you were clean as driven snow is shown to be bullshit as all your sniveling lies are.

You got a temporary ban for being a vicious little cunt, then a permanent ban for shoving your hand up a sockpuppet to evade your temp ban. Once the mods come back, this first troll account will be banned too.

At this point, I advocate for you being treated like that other vicious loser Bernie and having all your posts deleted. One click, and the gnat has departed the bull station.


Really you are accusing me for being a troll in a comment where you yourself are being a troll.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
dandan said:
Really you are accusing me for being a troll in a comment where you yourself are being a troll.

Fuck off LEROY.

You aren't a member of this site, and the rules don't protect you.

Now ooze back down the crack from which you effluviated.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
*SD* said:
Ok, it looks to me like a decision (by the mods) needs to be made as to whether leroy's new(er) account is allowed to remain active or not. Seeing as I'm not a bullshitter, or the type to sneak around behind anyone's back, I'll state here that I've PM'd Gnug, as he was online a few minutes ago to ask this exact question. Or rather make the suggestion that a decision needs to be made. I'll not address dandan until it's clear as to whether his account is allowed to remain active.

Just my chippings.


In the post banning this odious little man, australopithecus already included this particular account:
Because Leroy aka Back aka DanDan couldn’t be bothered to wait 2 weeks for his ban to expire that ban will no longer expire.

Regardless, if it was meant to be restricted just to a certain collection of usernames rather than the user behind those usernames, then it seems that banning would itself be a waste of time.
 
arg-fallbackName="dandan"/>
Sparhafoc said:
*SD* said:
Ok, it looks to me like a decision (by the mods) needs to be made as to whether leroy's new(er) account is allowed to remain active or not. Seeing as I'm not a bullshitter, or the type to sneak around behind anyone's back, I'll state here that I've PM'd Gnug, as he was online a few minutes ago to ask this exact question. Or rather make the suggestion that a decision needs to be made. I'll not address dandan until it's clear as to whether his account is allowed to remain active.

Just my chippings.


In the post banning this odious little man, australopithecus already included this particular account:
Because Leroy aka Back aka DanDan couldn’t be bothered to wait 2 weeks for his ban to expire that ban will no longer expire.

Regardless, if it was meant to be restricted just to a certain collection of usernames rather than the user behind those usernames, then it seems that banning would itself be a waste of time.

My theory is that Australopithecus noticed that Gung banned me for no justifiable reason which is why he allowed me to keep my “dandan” account.

Besides Sparhafoc, the fact that you almost always comment on my posts is an admission that you consider my posts relevant and worthy of commenting and worthy of your time.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
dandan said:
My theory is that Australopithecus noticed that Gung banned me for no justifiable reason which is why he allowed me to keep my “dandan” account.

Duh

Which is why he expressly noted 'dandan' - it couldn't be just that he overlooked banning that one too - no, secretly he agrees with you over his fellow mod.

dandan said:
Besides Sparhafoc, the fact that you almost always comment on my posts is an admission that you consider my posts relevant and worthy of commenting and worthy of your time.

It fits perfectly well with all the other crackpot shit you routinely dish out here. Australopithecus secretly agrees with you, and so do I. :lol:

No LEROY - you're a genuinely nasty person, and it's very rare that I consider making such observations about people on the internet who I usually just assume are playing a character but who are perfectly normal flawed but decent people in the real world. For a while, I extended the same consideration to you - but then the preponderance of evidence counted against such a benign view. You're vicious, petty, dishonest to a fault, spiteful, and dumb as a rock.
 
arg-fallbackName="dandan"/>
Sparhafoc said:
dandan said:
My theory is that Australopithecus noticed that Gung banned me for no justifiable reason which is why he allowed me to keep my “dandan” account.

Duh

Which is why he expressly noted 'dandan' - it couldn't be just that he overlooked banning that one too - no, secretly he agrees with you over his fellow mod.

dandan said:
Besides Sparhafoc, the fact that you almost always comment on my posts is an admission that you consider my posts relevant and worthy of commenting and worthy of your time.

It fits perfectly well with all the other crackpot shit you routinely dish out here. Australopithecus secretly agrees with you, and so do I. :lol:

No LEROY - you're a genuinely nasty person, and it's very rare that I consider making such observations about people on the internet who I usually just assume are playing a character but who are perfectly normal flawed but decent people in the real world. For a while, I extended the same consideration to you - but then the preponderance of evidence counted against such a benign view. You're vicious, petty, dishonest to a fault, spiteful, and dumb as a rock.


Ok, so can you provide an example of something that I made, that would be consider “Nasty”?
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
dandan said:
Ok, so can you provide an example of something that I made, that would be consider “Nasty”?


http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?p=186954#p186954

A member shares a post sharing their thinking that led them to consider suicide.

You then try and use the fact they'd considered suicide to resurrect an argument about free fucking will which is entirely irrelevant even at the best reading, and is clearly lacking in even the most elementary fucking empathy or concern for someone's well-being.

Hack tells you that you're misrepresenting him as you outright lied about what he said (what a surprise!).

You then reply:

http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?p=187011#p187011
leroy said:
Shame on you, you are pathetic, and a liar…….Idiot

Vicious, pathetic, willfully spiteful, crude, cretinous, detestable - or to use a single word 'nasty'.

No one gives a fuck whether you agree that it was a nasty post - the culprit's opinion of their behavior is irrelevant.

What is the case, however, is that it's typical of your shitty behavior here, and it's why your ban was past due.

Now fuck off.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?p=187045#p187045

It's Gnug's response when he banned LEROY.

Then LEROY came back as 'back' and 'dandan' and continued playing his spiteful little games where he fucks around with strangers he hates on the internet.
 
arg-fallbackName="dandan"/>
Sparhafoc said:
dandan said:
Ok, so can you provide an example of something that I made, that would be consider “Nasty”?


http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?p=186954#p186954

A member shares a post sharing their thinking that led them to consider suicide.

You then try and use the fact they'd considered suicide to resurrect an argument about free fucking will which is entirely irrelevant even at the best reading, and is clearly lacking in even the most elementary fucking empathy or concern for someone's well-being.

Hack tells you that you're misrepresenting him as you outright lied about what he said (what a surprise!).

You then reply:

http://leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?p=187011#p187011
leroy said:
Shame on you, you are pathetic, and a liar…….Idiot

Vicious, pathetic, willfully spiteful, crude, cretinous, detestable - or to use a single word 'nasty'.

No one gives a fuck whether you agree that it was a nasty post - the culprit's opinion of their behavior is irrelevant.

What is the case, however, is that it's typical of your shitty behavior here, and it's why your ban was past due.

Now fuck off.


Mmm to be honest I didn’t realized that the article was about hackenslash himself considering suicide.
Well anyway for that I apologize, and congratulations, for the first time you were capable of supporting your accusations, (Indeed I was being nasty)
But I was still correct, suicide implies will, and hackenslash claims not to believe in will.

leroy said:
Shame on you, you are pathetic, and a liar…….Idiot


Just for the record, those insults came after he insulted me.
 
Back
Top