SpecialFrog
New Member
Some of it is just based on is pretend definition of "transitional". For instance, the possible tetrapod footprints found elsewhere (and dated earlier) are interesting but irrelevant to Tiktaalik's status as a significant transitional fossil.itsdemtitans said:Can anyone address his claims about Tiktaalik? Or should I email Neil Shubin his claims and get his take?
Tiktaalik shows that transitional forms between fish and tetrapods existed. Whether it is the earliest example of this transition or whether modern tetrapods are actually descended from Tiktaalik is secondary. Tiktaalik may one day be "humiliated" like Archaeopteryx and we may have better examples. So what?
As for the "quality" stuff, it sounds like bollocks. I suspect the "some science article" he claims supports him doesn't do so.