Philosopher
New Member
Alright Joe, let me make it very clear for you.
You claimed that my sleeping person analogy was unsound. I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that point?
You claimed that personhood was like how a car is constructed. I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that point?
You compared the unborn to a "stack of raw steel, cowhide, rubber, and miscellaneous electrical components." I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that point?
You compared the unborn to cake mix. I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that?
You used the acorn/tree analogy as representative for the unborn. I responded in my 3rd post with a three point rebuttal. Where is your response to that point?
In all honesty, I do not see where you responded. If you could quote your responses to each of those points, I will be more than happy to concede.
You claimed that my sleeping person analogy was unsound. I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that point?
You claimed that personhood was like how a car is constructed. I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that point?
You compared the unborn to a "stack of raw steel, cowhide, rubber, and miscellaneous electrical components." I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that point?
You compared the unborn to cake mix. I responded in my 3rd post. Where is your response to that?
You used the acorn/tree analogy as representative for the unborn. I responded in my 3rd post with a three point rebuttal. Where is your response to that point?
In all honesty, I do not see where you responded. If you could quote your responses to each of those points, I will be more than happy to concede.