Master_Ghost_Knight
New Member
Seth, you keep telling this, but this ain't true. People have shown you evidence. You were to obtuse to try and understand what it meant.abelcainsbrother said:LOL! This is ridiculous! Only biologists accept evolution and all of the evidence of fossils and death and extinction is not looked at from an evolution perspective.And just hide behind all the made up evidence used to explain how life evolves without evidence that demonstrates life evolves.
We tried to engage and make you understand it. And all you did was to put out a circus act who's sole purpose was to avoid to answer any question and to avoid making any commitments that would force you to think. You are ignorant, you are willing ignorant, and worst than that you shown that you are capable of going trough great lengths and jump trough all the hoops so that you remain ignorant.
You can claim that you don't understand it. However you can not claim that there is no evidence, because evidence has been presented to you.
No you don't. What evidence is that?abelcainsbrother said:I have evidence a former world perished in this earth
What is a a "former" world? What would it make a world "former"? What would you mean by a world perished?
And what data points can you point to that shows that the particular world you are referring to meats those requirements?
Even you accept that dog's evolved from wolfs, tough you don't call it that. All that you don't agree is to the extent to which life is capable of changing and how related every other species is to one another.abelcainsbrother said:and you do not have evidence that demonstrates life evolves.
There is no evidence for this you say?
Oh, I don't know, except for almost everything from genetics, comparative morphology and physiology, to the fossil record.
Yes, evolution is backed up by evidence, the "gap fluff" is not. We agree on that.abelcainsbrother said:One theory is backup by evidence and the other is based on belief.How can you deny this?
Here is a thing that you might have not considered. It doesn't matter what we think about the bible. If you have a doubt about a scientific claim being right or wrong, here is where you don't get evidence from. A fucking book! Some people would claim that books are magical, but they don't come from magic. They don't magically know all the answers. Books come about because people write them, the ideas expressed in them are the ideas that the authors imprinted in to them. Consulting a book is equivalent of consulting other human beings taught in the past by means of ink committed to paper.abelcainsbrother said:Is it because you have a bias against the bible being right to the point that no evidence will change your mind?
Its not authoritative just because it is in paper. When you are consulting the bible you are not doing anything else than to consult someone else in the past about what do they think about the subject. You are not doing anything else than to reiterate the same mistakes that other people already claim is a mistake.
Specially the bible, when you say that you get your knowledge from the bible instead of believing in scientists, what you are saying is. "Hey I think that this tale from a goat herder who knew nothing about the world, who was probably demented, whose words have been distorted by scribes who didn't even speak the same language, knows more than scientist today".
Stop telling me that there are other people that think the same way you do. I already know that there are people that think like you do, namely you. And I am unconvinced by that. Further more, I have already heard all those people and what they had to say, I had followed the path that they have traced and came-up with the conclusion that it is wrong. I'm way ahead of you in that regard.
Do you want to convince me? Show me something in the real world I can look at!
Well, there is evidence. Do you want to take a look at them? Are you willing to follow along with me for a while to look at them? After all you can always go back to where you come from if you find out that I was wrong.abelcainsbrother said:I can tell you this,I would accept evolution if there was real evidence life evolves,but there is'nt.