• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Crashing in

Armitage

New Member
arg-fallbackName="Armitage"/>
Hey all.
I'm just a guy from Europe - 25 years old.
I'd describe myself as a passionate, militant agnostic. You can count me among atheists or pantheists if you want (doesn't make much difference to me), but I resent the surplus of certainty and lack of curiosity in both atheists and believers.

My favorite atheist talkers are Aron Ra, Seth Andrews and... Tim Minchin. From those you know.

I am a veteran of discussion. Freethinking, but extremely so. Most people who call themselves freethinkers question Christianity they were brought up in and call themselves skeptics. I can't help it, my mind is a weapon against whatever you present as a status quo or reality. Show me rules and I'll show you where they don't apply. Show me a slab of emmental cheese, I'll point out the holes. It's a reflex.
I strive to understand and overcome everything. Disagreement and criticism is a gift, if it's a constructive one. Essentially, I'd say I'm a natural-born philosopher in both Socratic and Platonic sense. But the age demands it, so I must prove points with science and demand practical, material results.


The nick Armitage... Well, I obviously liked the book. And if you know the character... He reminds me a lot of me. An hollow shell occupied and directed by a magnificent ghost that strives for freedom.

The reason why I'm here... Well, my great hobby is The Venus Project. Before you all go *not this shit again* :roll: let me say something. I've discussed a lot. With skeptics. I know Austrian economy, in fact I attend a school led by a Libertarian and we have a lot of it in curriculum, we have to make essays about it. And it's an interesting subject.
But I can see flaws in everything, in all kinds of economy, except The Venus Project. I can't find what's wrong with it, in fact all my senses are telling me that it's the best idea of all. All the arguments I have ever heard against TVP were either a conspiratory crap, superstitious crap, or they weren't about TVP at all. Either a straw man, or the guys had no idea what TVP actually is.

Might it be, that TVP is to skeptics what atheism is to Christians? Christians often assume that atheists were never proper Christians anyway, so they "explain" Christianity to them over and over again from the basics. Similarly, I know something is terribly wrong every time a disagreeing economist explain to me basics of economy - labor, capital, soil... That's like telling a professional cyclist how to work the pedals. That happens to me a lot, people assume I disagree because I don't know the basics.
Or they say that TVP is a sect... Srsly, I haven't personally met anyone who would even understand what TVP is, much less care to join a sect. In my experience, the less you learn about economic theories and the more understanding you have of nature, science and household family economics, the more you can understand TVP. I used to be a middle lefty democratic average Keynesian guy, then I saw the merit of Austrian school and minimal state and now I see that it all pales before the Venus Project that makes them all sound like bloodletting and skull trepanation practices. Surprisingly, if Libertarians would apply their Hayek consistently and took into account today's technologic level, they would invent TVP by themselves. Why they don't, why they stop halfway of 19th century, that is a point of sociologic fascination for me.

So I thought, let's try some new grounds. Let's google TVP and see a skeptical website with TVP on it. Theoretically I should be able to win every discussion about TVP, I did so far. It's fascinating how unskeptical can skeptics be, how they can commit the same mistakes of which they accuse religious people. Let's see if I can change someone's mind - I've already won discussions on TVP... It made me feel like an atheist activist among fundies. Equipped with ultimate arguments and evidence, but vulnerable against *la la la I don't hear you.* I hope you guys like disagreement and don't take things personally. I regret to prove people wrong - usually they're not interested in this economy stuff anyway, go in only for easy win and just stop reacting if they turn out to be wrong. Victory makes enemies, basically. Not everyone is a person enough to admit a "defeat", a correction of opinion. We're so desperate to be right and save face that we never say we don't know when we don't know.

The discussion on TVP will be hopefully approved by the mod and posted in the General Skepticism, so you might want to look there.
I'm not likely to enter into many other discussions, about religions etc, I have a plenty of these elsewhere. I'm just crashing in for the fun with TVP.
 
arg-fallbackName="Prolescum"/>
Armitage said:
Hey all.
I'm just a guy from Europe - 25 years old.
I'd describe myself as a passionate, militant agnostic.


Welcome :)

What in the three secret names of Bob Monkhouse is a militant agnostic?
You can count me among atheists or pantheists if you want (doesn't make much difference to me), but I resent the surplus of certainty and lack of curiosity in both atheists and believers.

Hasty generalisations are the third step to the dark side. After train spotting and mocking Babylon 5.
I am a veteran of discussion.

Aren't we all?
Freethinking, but extremely so.

How does one freethink extremely?
Most people who call themselves freethinkers question Christianity they were brought up in and call themselves skeptics.

There's an assumption or two in there; care to justify them?
I can't help it, my mind is a weapon against whatever you present as a status quo or reality.

What?
Show me rules and I'll show you where they don't apply.

What?
Show me a slab of emmental cheese, I'll point out the holes. It's a reflex.

What?
I strive to understand and overcome everything.

Everything? Are you applying for The Apprentice?
Disagreement and criticism is a gift, if it's a constructive one.

I disagree; they're tools.
Essentially, I'd say I'm a natural-born philosopher in both Socratic and Platonic sense. But the age demands it, so I must prove points with science and demand practical, material results.

What the...?
The nick Armitage... Well, I obviously liked the book. And if you know the character... He reminds me a lot of me. An hollow shell occupied and directed by a magnificent ghost that strives for freedom.

The reason why I'm here... Well, my great hobby is The Venus Project. Before you all go *not this shit again* :roll: let me say something.

This is an open platform...
 
arg-fallbackName="Inferno"/>
I know Austrian economy,

Are you an Austrian, by any chance? If so, where from? I'm from Vienna.
If you're not, why the heck would you be interested in the Austrian economy?

Though I did not read the rest: Welcome.
 
arg-fallbackName="Frenger"/>
Hi there.

Although I've failed to understand almost everything in your greetings, welcome nonetheless.
 
arg-fallbackName="Armitage"/>
Prolescum said:
What in the three secret names of Bob Monkhouse is a militant agnostic?
Bringing the gospel of many possibilities to people too sure of their reality :) Curiosity is a virtue and the unknown is more interesting and just as important as the known. At any given moment we operate with a vastly incomplete and non-representative model of reality. If we do it too well, we make it too complete and neat and developing only in narrow ways we expect and that is a thing to watch out. Narrow-mindedness.
Prolescum said:
Hasty generalisations are the third step to the dark side. After train spotting and mocking Babylon 5.
I know, only a Sith deals in absolutes. Don't worry, I've watched Babylon 5 (that space station was anyway sort of a forum between various species!) and I only generalize the truly notorious types. Every Babylon station has its Shadows.
What the hell is train spotting?
Prolescum said:
How does one freethink extremely?
By having a hard time thinking inside of the box.
There was a definition by my local Skeptic club, but I really can't find it right now. But I'd be one of a few freethinkers that perform meditation regularly. If you can meditate yourself out of rationality, if you meditate enough, you can meditate yourself back into it from the other side, that was the point.
Prolescum said:
Most people who call themselves freethinkers question Christianity they were brought up in and call themselves skeptics.
There's an assumption or two in there; care to justify them?
I hung out on lots of atheist forums and they all knew the flaws of Christianity, many of them got to like skepticism and freethought a lot. They could apply it on religions, but many lacked the same skepticism when it came to other ideas. We are brought to think that economy means capitalism and that politics means democracy and democracy is freedom. Some fancy themselves critics of such concepts, but they don't go far enough.
Prolescum said:
What?
What?
What?
Late night meditation rush.
Prolescum said:
Everything? Are you applying for The Apprentice?
I don't know, what is The Apprentice?
Prolescum said:
Disagreement and criticism is a gift, if it's a constructive one.
I disagree; they're tools.
:lol: yes, you're right.
Inferno said:
I know Austrian economy,

Are you an Austrian, by any chance? If so, where from? I'm from Vienna.
If you're not, why the heck would you be interested in the Austrian economy?

Though I did not read the rest: Welcome.
Thanks. I'm studying in Prague, which is one of the best places to study the Austrian school of economy. It was invented by Ludwig von Mises and his think-tank in early 20th century and is quite popular with Libertarians like Ron Paul.
 
arg-fallbackName="Prolescum"/>
Armitage said:
Prolescum said:
What in the three secret names of Bob Monkhouse is a militant agnostic?
Bringing the gospel of many possibilities to people too sure of their reality :)

So you're not a sceptic, then. That's fine. What is a militant agnostic?
Curiosity is a virtue and the unknown is more interesting and just as important as the known.

I'm not sure how this addresses my question. I know what both of the words mean, I'm interested in what you mean by them in combination.
At any given moment we operate with a vastly incomplete and non-representative model of reality. If we do it too well, we make it too complete and neat and developing only in narrow ways we expect and that is a thing to watch out. Narrow-mindedness.

Vastly incomplete, sure. Non-representative model of reality? Hyperbole. Sounds like something David Icke might say.
Prolescum said:
Hasty generalisations are the third step to the dark side. After train spotting and mocking Babylon 5.
I know, only a Sith deals in absolutes. Don't worry, I've watched Babylon 5 (that space station was anyway sort of a forum between various species!) and I only generalize the truly notorious types.

You shouldn't generalise at all if you're concerned about narrow-mindedness. Which you say you are... Is this a symptom of the righteous self-belief that many so-called freethinkers and sceptics suffer?
What the hell is train spotting?

It's self-explanatory.
Prolescum said:
How does one freethink extremely?
By having a hard time thinking inside of the box.
There was a definition by my local Skeptic club, but I really can't find it right now. But I'd be one of a few freethinkers that perform meditation regularly. If you can meditate yourself out of rationality, if you meditate enough, you can meditate yourself back into it from the other side, that was the point.

I'm afraid I don't understand what this means.
Prolescum said:
There's an assumption or two in there; care to justify them?
I hung out on lots of atheist forums and they all knew the flaws of Christianity, many of them got to like skepticism and freethought a lot. They could apply it on religions, but many lacked the same skepticism when it came to other ideas.

Well that's been my experience too, but it isn't exclusive to atheists and agnostics, nor is it only sceptics and freethinkers who were brought up in Christianity that commit it.
We are brought to think that economy means capitalism

Are we? I wasn't, and that wasn't even my area of study.
...and that politics means democracy and democracy is freedom.

Ah, can I assume you're American? That's not meant as an insult, only that the education system there is... unrepresentative.

Duh. You said you're European. Which is a bit weird, given our historical experiences.
Some fancy themselves critics of such concepts, but they don't go far enough.

That's the thing about people, you can't get them all to agree to a single proposal.
Prolescum said:
What?
What?
What?
Late night meditation rush.

Okay.
Prolescum said:
Everything? Are you applying for The Apprentice?
I don't know, what is The Apprentice?

It's a television program where contestants write lists of vacuous, often nonsensical, self-aggrandising statements about their talents and attributes in the hopes of having the half-truths in their curricula vitae* exposed. As I understand it.


*is that the plural? Latin experts PM me
 
arg-fallbackName="DukeTwicep"/>
I hope you don't mind my crude dissection. I just picked out the fun lines.
[showmore=Armitage wrote]
I am a veteran of discussion.
Freethinking, but extremely so.
I can't help it, my mind is a weapon against whatever you present as a status quo or reality.
Show me rules and I'll show you where they don't apply.
Show me a slab of emmental cheese, I'll point out the holes. It's a reflex.
I strive to understand and overcome everything.
Essentially, I'd say I'm a natural-born philosopher in both Socratic and Platonic sense.
An hollow shell occupied and directed by a magnificent ghost that strives for freedom.
I've discussed a lot. With skeptics.
I know Austrian economy, in fact I attend a school led by a Libertarian and we have a lot of it in curriculum, we have to make essays about it.
But I can see flaws in everything
That's like telling a professional cyclist how to work the pedals. That happens to me a lot
Theoretically I should be able to win every discussion about TVP, I did so far.
It's fascinating how unskeptical can skeptics be, how they can commit the same mistakes of which they accuse religious people.
Let's see if I can change someone's mind
I've already won discussions on TVP
It made me feel like an atheist activist among fundies.
Equipped with ultimate arguments and evidenceI regret to prove people wrong
Victory makes enemies
I'm not likely to enter into many other discussions, about religions etc, I have a plenty of these elsewhere.
I'm just crashing in for the fun with TVP.
But I'd be one of a few freethinkers that perform meditation regularly.
[/showmore]
First thought: Holy shit, you sure are full of yourself, who are you trying to impress with your boasting? The self righteousness. The ego.
Take a chill pill.
Welcome to the forums.
 
arg-fallbackName="Armitage"/>
DukeTwicep said:
I hope you don't mind my crude dissection. I just picked out the fun lines.

First thought: Holy shit, you sure are full of yourself, who are you trying to impress with your boasting? The self righteousness. The ego.
Take a chill pill.
Welcome to the forums.
As I said. Late night meditation rush. Some people drink, some people smoke dope. And then go to the forum. I meditate and must be doing something right, because it feels damn good. Wasn't trying to impress, but that's what it does to me. Meditation isn't just passive sitting, it's doing something with nerves and hormones and it's very... inspiring.
In fact I'm doing it again right now and feel my modesty slipping away. Damn, must stop writing.
 
arg-fallbackName="Vivre"/>
Armitage said:
because it feels damn good
That sounds ecstatic to me and I would not trust reasonings that arise from it.

Nonetheless are inspirations of high potential and might persist on calm ground.

greets ~ Vivre
 
Back
Top