A Question about the historicity of Jesus

[Bango Skank]

Many hebrew names (all of them?) have secondary meanings.

Yeah, that's kind of my point.

Your point was more like "This person would be called X, but because of the secondary meaning of that name, lets call him Y".

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

Reassessing Paul's Timeline by Bart Willruth, Part 1

I realize that any attempt to date, or re-date, Paul will be speculative, but that process also includes the attempt to maintain the traditional timeline. But lack of proof doesn't preclude assessing probability. That which I will present in brief below is a novel paradigm; I would point out that the value of a paradigm rests in its utility in answering questions and drawing together a coherent explanation for the data. This is still a work in process.

I found this post to be interesting and thought other people might want to read it.

 

[Led Zeppelin]

So atheists, in attempt to discredit the historicity of Jesus, invent a group of conspirators which have no historicity. Say it aint so?

Several years have since past. And no one is talking about Richard Carrier anymore.

 

[*SD*]

So atheists, in attempt to discredit the historicity of Jesus, invent a group of conspirators which have no historicity. Say it aint so?

Several years have since past. And no one is talking about Richard Carrier anymore.

WHAT in the BLUE FUCK is this? What are you even asking here?