Search results

Well, then I guess you select yourself out. What the fuck do you want, a cookie for being a "rebel" in the most pathetic way possible? "I'm not going to join that club that didn't invite me to join! That'll show them!!"

The great part is that it selects out immature people who have a temper tantrum every time someone suggests rules. 8-)

As much as I hate the RNC, I've lived through several Florida hurricanes, and unless the hurricane can hit the bank accounts of the Republicans and leave everything else alone... I hope the storm misses land as much as possible.

Re: Family Research Council Shooting - Am I Reading This Wro Lefties aren't normally gun nuts, don't normally talk about "taking out" their political opponents, and don't hold events at shooting ranges against their opponents... so you're fine.

No. Use the search function, please and thank you.

Did I mention that there's good eating on a fetus? Probably better eating on a newborn, the skin doesn't have that briny amniotic fluid taste. Also, anyone who just says "adoption" and thinks they've made a valid point is dumb, and has NOT made a valid point.

Actually, no. Vehicles also count as "sovereign territory" for the purposes of diplomatic affairs. Theoretically, the Ecuadoran embassy could put up a large plastic tube from the door to a car parked on the street, and claim that the tube constitutes part of their embassy.

I think it is nonsense. Sweden should have given him immunity from extradition to the US, and Assange should have been carted off to Sweden.

No. Any other easy questions?

Re: Every politician I disagree with IS Adolf Hitler, litera And yet, even the Republicans have not yet reached as far as Hitler, by a pretty fair margin.

Yeah, pretty much. Any community that accepts his sort of behavior is no sort of community I'd feel comfortable being a part of. He's seemingly incapable of doing anything but attacking people for having "wronged him" in ways that only exist in his head, let alone apologizing for his part in...

A bit more than that, because TF has ALREADY released personal emails, and brags about having all the information he needs to blackmail people. All he has to do is not scrub the personal information, and we don't have any reason to believe that he hasn't already leaked personal information, or...

Anyone who would make the assumption that there's no risk is seriously wrong. TF has already violated people's privacy by reading emails that he knew he wasn't supposed to have access to. He further violated their privacy by sharing emails with third parties. He's actively bragging about doing...

...and also possibly not far enough, in a sense. Depends on your focus.

Honestly, it might be worse in a way. As deluded as TF is, as pathologically paranoid as he's behaving, at least he's directly involved. His defenders are engaging in the same rhetoric and seem that they'd behave in the same reason for absolutely no reason besides their fawning supplication to a...

And clearly, TF has some rather serious mental/emotional issues that would be best addressed by a doctor of some sort. Here's a simple thought experiment: Let's say that I go to one of TF's YouTube videos, and leave a comment that he doesn't like. He calls me an asshole, deletes my comment and...

There's no "allegedly" or need for various and sundry idiots to demand more evidence. TF has admitted to pretty much everything he's been accused of doing, which gives people perfect reason to believe he'll do more with the information he's taken. Asking for evidence in the face of admission...

I'm currently shunning you for being a putz.

Yes, I would. For the stinkeye part, for the part that makes you think you're entitled to treat other people like shit BEFORE you have any evidence.

You assume everyone is lying all the time? Or just when it suits you? And you feel that assumption is worth calling them out as potential liars, or would it be possible for you to save the accusatory tone and just ask for a link?