Search results

I'm not here to have ANY discussion with YOU. Get over YOURSELF. If you've countered any of my arguments, I've not looked at them, for the simple fact that I came here to have this discussion with Aron, not you, not anyone else. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

I think I'm done casting pearls before swine. If you would like to have a one on one discussion with me, and you're on Facebook, here's a link to my page. https://www.facebook.com/BACDM/ Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

I'm sorry, I wasn't quoting anyone. I am new to forums. Typically I engage atheists on Facebook. Interesting how you live up to being the stereotypical atheist in that you're never beyond personally insulting people who don't hold to the same beliefs you do. Your persistence of inserting...

Looks like your arguments have been utterly and completely refuted by yet another presuppositionalist. This is what happens when you can't interupt your opponent or have other likeminded individuals interfere. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

I found this to be very interesting. https://youtu.be/flrncNZlOOw Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

Please excuse some of my typing errors. Had to rush. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

I gotta be honest. I'm a little confused by your response me in what's supposed to be our actual discussion. You've actually quoted yourself and then went on to offer refutations following the quotes.... of yourself... With that said, I'd like to recap on the points that actually matter. 1...

I did run off. I've been working extra shifts. My apologies. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

I'll get back to you tomorrow. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

Assertions aren't refuted by simply refusing to accept them. You either employ your reasoning to come to conclusions in regards to the corroboration of the outcomes of your reasoning to external factors, or you're only interested in being logical when in suits you and this is not one of those...

I'll rephrase. In order to conclude that an outcome of your reasoning is corroborated with any outcome, you must employ your reasoning. This is a very simple question, and we both already know the answer. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

But to determine whether or not an outcome corroborates with your reasoning, you employ your reasoning, yes? Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

Which you employ your reasoning to evaluate, yes? Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

On what basis do you presume that your reasoning is valid? Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

I'm curious to know why other people are inviting themselves into a discussion which actually intended to be between Aron and myself. I'm honestly not in the least bit interested in what anyone else has to say at this time. Either Aron can choose another way to have this discussion so others...

The answer is that all claims regarding scripture should as a rule be compared to scripture in a hermeneutically sound fashion. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

// If i missed anything, let me know. But if you do, please first provide the justification for your capacity to do so without begging the question. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

If you wish to carry out a discussion with me, here's a link to my page. https://www.facebook.com/BACDM/ Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

This is a discussion between myself and Aron Ra. If you read his initial post, you'd probably understand that this isn't the place for your conjecture. Sent from my SM-G930R6 using Tapatalk

A person can believe something to be true before having justification for said belief. The justification for that which I presuppose is found in God's revealed word. So I went from assuming blindly the validity of my reasoning, to discovering the justification for that assumption. Sent from my...