Search results

So last night I spent hours making a musical montage of Venomfangx clips in the form of a comedic elegy about his Youtube career. I used a song by U2 called "Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill me." This was the song used in the movie Batman Forever. I thought it appropriate because of Venom's...

I listen to Lifehouse, they at least USED to be a Christian band. Many of their songs can still be interpreted religiously. They're still pretty good. Also, U2 mentions God at least once per album. However, they're not IN YOUR FACE about it, and they talk about God in a more poetic sense.

To effectively decide whether capital punishment is worth keeping around, we must first ask the question: Why does violent crime occur in the first place? Some of you may write it off to an unchangeable aspect of human nature; however, I don't think that this is the case. The average sane...

Excuse me, but my account, same username as on here, got hit by 3,370 plus one stars. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. :)

I don't know that i've ever heard of this feature. I do know that as Youtube's brought more big companies aboard they have taken away many liberties we users used to have. I think personally the most accurate title for this forum would've been "Laci Green momentarily threatens DMCA against...

You know, the Stewie avatar fits you perfectly, lol. :)

No, you did not address that part of the definition, PBJ. Stop avoiding, man up, and explain how the original video mimicked the characteristics of Laci's body of work. Sure, tell me how you made the screenshots video but not the first video. If your explanation is reasonable I'll let it go...

I already explained exactly why the video was not a parody, you keep ignoring the "characteristic of the person or their work" part. Why don't you explain that, PBJ? And why don't you explain why you're not the person who made the original video in the first place? Why is it so important to...

*snort* Yeah, that guy. And a sadistic streak that runs longer than the line of guys who want to date Laci online. :D

Mmmm....chocolate...making me hungry... :D Actually, you're right. With enough time you'd probably end up like The Amazing Atheist. *shudder*

Who knows, maybe I've helped kickstart the next big Youtube celebrity! ;)

LOL! You never know in this crazy world. You know, I didn't even come here looking for this thread. I came to this forum because I saw that someone had linked to one of my videos here, and I was scouring around trying to find it. This has been quite a fun diversion so far, though. :)

You did a damn good job of it, too. :) I wonder what PBJ will have to say next?

What's your Youtube name? I'll subscribe to you. :)

That's an excellent idea, and I agree. If he's just a random dude who found the video and wants to blow the whistle, then why is he trying so hard?

I have actually suspected it from the beginning, as no other person I've seen has made a big deal out of these videos. This last post by him screams "FREUDIAN SLIP!" To be honest, only one kind of person would go to such lengths to be such an asshole regarding her: someone who's pissed that...

YOU made this video, eh? That means you had access to the original message exchange between Laci and the slimeball. That means that you ARE the fucking slimeball who made the video in the first place and made sure Laci saw it. And now you're here deliberately trying to damage her reputation...

Actually, free speech does have certain limitations, as decided by several Supreme Court cases. When someone is clearly abusing their right to free speech by working systematically to hurt others, then there's going to be a problem. Furthermore, the slimeball doesn't have any actual rights...

Making one video isn't, but refusing to take it down when it is clearly stated by the targeted victim to be offensive and repeatedly messaging her on the topic with an inflammatory intent would be. I'm sure that if I asked her to send me screenshots of the exchange from the author's end it...

My analysis: Whoever made the video private messaged Laci to make sure she saw it. The video's sole intent was to ridicule and demean her. That the author of the video would ensure that Laci saw something which ridiculed and demeaned her by way of private message could qualify as harassment...