Search results

Well, since you mentionned that let me get back to a point I was talking about in the beginning, so by definition you want to say that the bacterial flagellum and most of evolutionnary processes are nothing but sheer chance, right ? Ok, but why does the sperm have a tail that allows it to move...

Oh, I'm sorry for both the two simulations I thought they were trying to show how you get seemingly designed things by random processes, I saw a video two months ago or something around that was promoting ID and I got fooled by them and with the title of the book which was the blind watchmaker...

Sorry, I had to get more details about it that's fair, that was bad from me, however I did search and it always stays in the cercle of the same problem...

I personally think that there is no evidence for the supernatural whatsoever, everything humans thought was the work of a supernatural agency was at the end discovered to be nature's, we live on a massive universe which is billions of light years wide, and that is MASSIVE in an unimaginable way...

What fallacy might that be? His program shows how selection can work. His mistake is thinking that selection is the only game in town. I don't see how that is not a fallacy, Dawkins shows that he can get that sentence through random variations (random flow of letters) and a selection process...

This is actually a fairly decent description of natural selection, but I see you are hung up on the word "selection". Well, I have often said that semantics is the last bastion of creationism, so to not sink this ship at the beginning, let us change the term natural selection to "survival of the...

In many cases I see lots of aspects of evolution unquestionned, and for me the theory shows some mathematical and logical inconsistencies, in an abstract point of view I view evolution as a random variable and a process of sheer dumb luck. Let me explain what I mean by this ...