Search results

Whenever I have mentioned these, (as I did in the speech below) I also show screenshots of the news where I got that information. So it should be easy enough to Google each one.

And here I thought you'd buggered off somewhere. I guess I'll continue where I left off. Further studies show it is remarkably easy for peptides to subsequently assemble into ordered protein-like, two-dimensional structures – amyloids – from basic building blocks. This discovery supports the...

The question was "do you understand and accept the evidence I have shown so far?" The answer is obvious no because no. Pity. I don't know why believers don't understand that science is an investigation rather than a belief. Believers certainly don't understand how dishonest it is to assert...

Getting back on track, now that we have established that the conditions of the prebiotic earth were capable of producing organic chemicals including amino acids, we need evidence supporting the the next step. A separate study showed that synthetic molecules fold up into abiotic proteins. So life...

When I said that my evidence is peer reviewed mainstream science and that your evidence is not evidence, you argued that, as you could say the same; as if you too have evidence from peer reviewed mainstream science. I challenged you on that, saying that you can't say that because there is no...

I didn't give you a "story". I outlined the facts indicating important conditions of the prebiotic earth. Are you aware of any primate fossils ≥ 100 million years old? Are you aware of any mammal fossils ≥ 200 million years old? Are you aware of any dinosaur fossils ≥ 300 million years old...

Notice that the studies I provided include a duplication Urey-Miller, and an update, where Urey and Miller did the same experiment to account for suggested alternate conditions, and the experiment worked then too. Then notice also that experiment was never debunked and was more recently...

Welcome to the League of Reason. Since we both agree that there was once a time when there was no life on this planet, and then there was, I will present evidence that it occurred naturally, and you will present your evidence that it happened magically. To begin, according to every ounce of...

Noah and his wife are supposed to represent the root in this case, from which the three variants diverged. Funny thing about that. Ken Ham's Ark Encounter just made up names for them. One of them is called Ariel, named after Disney's Little Mermaid.

Yeah, that doesn't really fit with the topic of "what is the most recent common ancestor of humans and monkeys", does it?

My son gave me that mug. It's a quote from Game Of Thrones.

I'm moving onto Episode 22 now. Here is what Hovind said there.

I found it. It was apparently posted by AnswersInGenesis rather than mainstream science journals, for reasons that will become obvious when you read the blog post rebuttal by evograd.

Thanks again for your help, guys. This is what I came up with. It will go public tomorrow morning.

Thank you kindly.

I have noticed that his arguments are typically the usual creationist clap trap.

I'm supposed to debate this guy on Tuesday. The question is, "What is the most recent common ancestor of humans & monkeys?"

We have a Kia Niro EV. We have 250 miles of range and only need to charge once or twice a week. We charge from home overnight, and it is so cheap that I can't even see the difference on our electric bill. It's like six cents a minute or something like that, and the performance is amazing!

You guys were very helpful with a previous video script. For this next one I'm working on, I think I need to hear from some nerds who know something about computers and how to measure comparative complexity.

Hovind was just arrested again, this time for domestic abuse of his illegal 3rd wife. If he replies to me, it will only be as a distraction from his mounting legal issues.