Search results

Yes, a phytosaur and I think we might be able to pin this down to being a Pseudopalatus Mcauleyi.

Dang - too late. But maybe got the extra detail: Camarasaurus Grandis

I too was religiously raised and apart from the 10 Commandments, the other so called "laws" were wholly neglected unless one became a Bible scholar. Unfortunately thenexttodie seems not to understand the ingredients of "laws". That is, they are very clearly defined and how they are applied, and...

Why do you have an image of 4-fingered hands either side of a screen? I am confused as to how these are correct, except that perhaps it was merely illustrative?

Re: Proteintransport into Mitochondria is irreducible comple So what's your point? We don't yet know how life began, and we all know that it is a work in progress.

Re: Proteintransport into Mitochondria is irreducible comple The evolutionary path which has led to you existing was equally in place to for the processes which you outlined, but were unable to explain. Given there are books on biology which go through the detail, it is not necessary to...

Re: Proteintransport into Mitochondria is irreducible comple Mere assertion. Evolution is called that because it means those processes can be explained, while you offered only your unsupported viewpoint.

Re: The amazing fatty acid synthase nano factories, and orig Deja vu

Of course not! God fully endowed Adam to reproduce sexually. Unfortunately Adam took a ribbing from God and asexually created Eve, which must have been a disappointing start to life, given (Genesis 1.27) women had already been created. Nevertheless, everything you need to know was fully put in...

You have missed the point. They said, We suggest that there is no naturalistic explanation that can account for the origin and maintenance of sex. So Adam and Eve were created by their god for sexual reproduction, and all other animals which use the same means were also god's creatures. Those...

You realise you are claiming 100 x 0 = > 0 ? Exaggerating an already exaggerated claim is exponentially foolish! Where was the smiley face?

Re: Rubisco is the most important enyzme on the planet. Yes I understand the systems described and would have avoided them if I were a designer. For example, I would never have designed a human rib cage (essentially the "chassis" for our form) such that it allows our organs to slump out of it...

Which part did you not understand from the previous answers offered to you, which make your post so puerile - to the point of being comedic? When you write the nonsense you do, what makes you believe you deserve the attention you actually get? If I was your parent, I would be sending you off to...

We both now appreciate the difficulty which comes with maintaining - for more than a few hours - a level of stupidity commensurate with cretinism. Our respect for Bernie is unfathomable.

Re: Rubisco is the most important enyzme on the planet. A designer would do away with complexity and just make organic functions happen with the minimum of fuss. If there were a designer capable of the complexity you propose, then surely that designer would be capable of omitting unnecessary...

You have evolved. QED (I hope Bernie was watching.)

I know you cannot answer my question with honestness. If you answer my question first, then I will answer yours.

Re: Rubisco is the most important enyzme on the planet. You have confused life with non life in the evolutionary context. To boot, adding abiogenesis to the mix makes your writings incoherent and nonsensical. No, through the well established and time tested processes we call evolution...

Yes! It was a serious question.

Are you serious? You think I am lightweight because evolution is mythology and you don't see what I am asking is vital? You will seek and find the truth in my question. Please do the answer honestly.