Search results

It's only a joke to you because it doesn't agree with the Evolution Model. Since you are smart person and a quest for truth you can at least read those links I posted. The best way to debate is to know your opponent's position. I had to this when debating flat-earthers. It was painful but I...

I found these links to get you started: https://answersingenesis.org/creation-science/baraminology/taxonomically-restricted-essential-genes-organisms-family-tree/ https://answersingenesis.org/creation-science/baraminology/baraminic-study-blood-flukes-family-schistosomatidae/...

Yes, and I suppose you are more interested in the biological part in the Creation Model. I thought I answered this a couple years ago, but my mind cannot go back that far. And I sure don't feel like searching for it. Good talking to you! Glad you responded. This is a good idea though, and...

The Creation Model does change with time. And so does the Evolution model.

You are going to have to explain to me what is wrong with my definition of information? It's not arbitrary. This is simply what you and I and everyone else experience everyday, and I only put it down in words. No, the computer would be the hardware. The software would have the information...

And here is the difference between life and non-life. Life will have the compounds to grow, reproduce, etc. Once it is dead, the exact same compounds are there. Nothing changed in regard to composition. Nothing. But the chemical reactions in the now dead organism succumbs to natural laws...

No, not everything is information. I don't care what the "scientific community" recognizes. Information is exactly the way I described it. This is testable and observable science. Lightning striking a tree isn't information. Erosion isn't information. We all know what information is so why...

Anything that has instructions, the ability to transmit those instructions, a receiver able to translate and read the instructions, and finally execution of those instructions. This is basically how programs, software, and have a conscious mind works. This is what I mean by information, which...

Okay, I hate to ask but what then is chemistry?

See below:

Correct. What we observe is obviously obeying natural laws. Amino acids to proteins doesn't break any laws of nature, just like fixing a window isn't breaking any laws of nature. No magic or supernatural involved here. But(!)....life in general doesn't follow the laws but controls and...

I see them as the funnies though.

Thanks for your response Nesslig20. Sorry that I don't respond to your whole response, I usually find the crux of your message in just one sentence (in this case, "It is chemistry, very complex chemistry, but chemistry nonetheless". Just don't think I only read a fraction of it. I believe...

If I had to distinguish between life and non-life I would say the key component would be information. Unlike being just chemistry, life harnesses chemical reactions to enact the "program" rather than being a slave to the chemical reactions. Once life ends, then life succumbs to chemical...

Saying life is just chemistry is a blunder that harms biology. If I had to distinguish between life and non-life I would say the key component would be information. Unlike being just chemistry, life harnesses chemical reactions to enact the "program" rather than being a slave to the chemical...

The paper talks about a paradigm shift due to the evidence of what we now know; i.e. de novo genes indeed do exist. The paper acknowledges this fact but notice none of it is observation-based but more about pattern-based. The scientific community will likely accept this because of its...

Good question. I know that you and I are experiencing life right now and that is all good and dandy until we become dead (opposite of life).

Then show me if it's just chemistry. If you want, take something that is already dead because all of the components are already there in place. :)

We always have experienced and observed life coming from life. If you feel differently due to scientific observation of non-life to life then present it. The burden of proof is on your side. It's like experiencing the fact that windows shatter and break. The window could of shattered...

Perhaps you are understanding me, but to make sure...non-life to life is also supernatural.