Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
Re: Potholer54 (Peter Hadfield) debates "Lord" Monckton
Just to add: this is the source of Watts' comment:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/23/moncktons-slide-presentation-to-the-california-assembly/#comment-933571
The people on skepticalscience are also keeping an eye on this...
If you're so keen to be pedantic, then you should know that a flat Friedmann-Lemaà®tre-Robertson-Walker metric is not the same as a Minkowski metric. The latter is static, the former isn't.
Australopithecus obviously means that QM is counter-intuitive. Stop being an ass.
I had more than 3000. Not that I care either.
The number of complaints is rising:
http://www.youtube.com/results?uploaded=d&search_query=channel+views+reset&search_type=videos&suggested_categories=22%2C24%2C20%2C23%2C25%2C26&utm_source=upload_restrict_tip_top
Are you sure? Even very popular youtubers have now low channel views. Dprjones now has 452, NonStampCollector has 558. I'm sure they had tens of thousands. Even Thunderf00t has little over 4000 now.
As I just checked my youtube channel, I saw that it had ... 1 view. What the hell? Why did they reset the counter?
This is so not good for my confidence... :cry:
I'm very sceptical about all that pattern seeking stuff. In fact, this study found the opposite: the CMB is fully consistent with standard cosmology:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1268
They actually mention the result of Feeney et al in the published version of their paper. But I guess that...