"...citation is a reference to the source of information used in your research. Any time you directly quote, paraphrase or summarize the essential elements of someone else's idea in your work..."
1) The cited source is not federal law.
That ISN'T allowed which is the conflict. Both are violations.
One is a hard count and the other is an ESTIMATE.
If Corona goes against a mask it still has a better chance of getting through the mask through a variety of reasons compared to a caliber that an armor is rated to stop. One is inherently more reliable than the other in their intended use.
Covid has natural cure. Assuming the human body is strong enough eventually you will get rid of Covid in practical terms in having no symptoms and in the technical when you repeatedly test negative and have no symptoms.
How about those that are compromised and die due to the extra stress of the vaccine?
That depends on the consideration of
It isn't like I can submit a source for my brother's experience now can I? Elon Musk did take different tests and ironically it proves that Corona virus testing is flimsy depending on the type of test. Corona is traced to the same region as their biological weapons lab in Wuhan
Far more have died due to Heart Disease yet people still eat unhealthy foods - their choice. Far more Americans have died due to firearms and yet people still choose to have firearms again - their choice.
Even without punctuation the order isn't switched. It still said young = less old = more.
What is the likelihood or the consideration in terms of reality of this?
That doesn't seem to be the case in the U.S..
My proposal would make capital punishment more less costly because again the majority cost of executing someone is the appeals process. Under my proposal there would be no appeals process on repeat offenders. Thus the majority expense would no longer be relevant. This proves you are do not understand or are not listening.
The police, police the community. The passport the Chinese issue are good to leave their homes at certain times. The police enforce the law even in China. Also yes there are instances of Chinese welding Chinese into their own homes. It was legal to do so within a time period as those passports do allow travel at certain times.
I thought the argument was group over the individual in the context of the U.S.?
Need some specific examples in the U.S. to prove this. This is too vague to say yay or nay.
Yet legal theft and non prosecution of those in California and New York make it unlikely offenders are going to be prosecuted citing discrimination being the principle the law was implemented. Which is ridiculous and a direct result of the Victim Olympics types
That would depend on actual enforcement. It is rare to see police officers nowadays. Keep in mind we are at record lows in terms of active police officers as many have retired early or quit after the verdict of Floyd. We don't have the enforcement to worry about such minor things. It is unlikely most laws are to be enforced.
Well again there wouldn't be a way to vote on the issues as the issues are put into omnibus bills which include different topics in the same law. What does gun control have to do with infrastructure? Roads have nothing to do with firearms and thus people vote against what they majority don't agree with.
Vast majority of young people which are the majority of so called progressives don't vote though. If anything it seems like it would primarily effect conservative voting as it seems people on the right want less regulations not more regulations and would put up with far less compared to those on the left.
Much lower than 100% and frankly a little better in terms of a coin flip is not something I would rely on.
If you paid attention to the whole argument you would realize that I am generally distrustful of the Corona vaccine and testing and the like. People dying regardless of taking the vaccine is made to illustrate why people don't trust the vaccines. Also there isn't any extra evidence that they also didn't die from the vaccine. Remember that the science on Corona virus isn't very exact?
We already know vaccines CAN be deadly.
So a firearm exploding in your hand is not dangerous? Muskets exploding like any other firearm usually have to do with a barrel obstruction. Barrel obstructions can happen to muskets and modern arms alike. I think your own example is simply a point in favor of my argument.
You cannot cite citations of a positive claim when the deaths relating to Covid and Vaccine are not entirely known. There have been report of people dying when A they have had the vaccine 1st and second dose and have died regardless but not due to complications related to breathing which the Corona virus is famous for. You cannot cite an unknown.
Yes like I said before these vaccines are largely untested and long term people don't know what the effects are. They effect people differently. I remember 1 news report resulting in a cyst at the injection site and even medical professionals are questioning the vaccine that has been mandated for them to take.
Again this is an unknown. There have been people on camera that work in the medical field saying this. How do you cite an unknown? It is like citing where God lives and stuff.
The original context is that in the comparison given both types of firearms can be dangerous. Barrel obstructions lead to catastrophic failure of the firearm. I am aware of the history of firearms clearly you are not. You also don't have any real world experience either. Case in Point:
You asked. You are ignoring that evidence and not actually looking.
Those who work in the medical field question the vaccines yes or no? Yes they do.
We already know the vaccines are largely untested considering the normal process to get approval. We already know the vaccines enlarge your lymph nodes after injection. We already know people have died from Corona virus after getting the injection. We already know it is more likely you get Corona virus after a certain time period after getting the injection.
Not tested to the same degree as other vaccinations NO. They have not. Getting a EUA is NOT the same as being granted FDA approval.
Ok so you do support my right not to get vaccinated then claiming bodily autonomy?
What's that got to do with it?
In one of your posts, you accidentally "doxed" yourself (
My standards!) by saying "Here in Texas".The author of the article is a lawyer in Texas - one would hope he was familiar with his own state's laws.
Even so, they're still in breach of the law, and if the neighbours complain enough, they will be sent.
The one's I cited didn't: they may have had different decibel levels depending on the time of day or night but they applied throughout the 24 hours.
We're not talking about special occasions when the community is involved (the group) - I am, and have been, talking specifically about a individual's actions. And I acknowledged that they varied depending on place and time.
Again, the sources I cited discuss various exceptions such as gun ranges, etc.
No, I'm not - I covered all of this with my sources and posts.
As I've said before, special privileges shouldn't be allowed - Americans are supposed to be "equal before the law", according to your constitution. If they allowed someone to carry on religious-exemption grounds, it'd breach the 1A.
The estimate for CoViD deaths is based on actual figures - at least 600,000 Americans have died, the additional deaths are based on unreported/misidentified deaths.
The example you gave is a van-bomb - not just a vehicle on its own being driven into a crowd.
The figures are accurate [3]
On what evidence are you basing the claim that locals are attempting to get federal funding by claiming more Corona deaths? Again, is this from a conspiracy website?
Just because a pre-existing condition leaves one vulnerable to CoViD does not mean that that condition killed you.
Although there are varying levels of effectiveness depending on the mask, this is no different than a vest.
You said (#59):
So, I asked:
So, is there a citation for what you implied?
Now you're being facetious.
Again, a source for this would be useful.
Neither of these articles are accessible to me - "Sorry, this content is not available in your region."
HWIN has already dealt with the Elon Musk tests.
Comparing a non-contagious disease - heart disease - with a contagious one - a virus - is comparing apples and oranges.
Young are "less old".
My point was that the group takes precedence over the individual - if the group can send you to prison/psychiatric institute, your individual rights are meaningless.
The operative word here being "seems".
So, you just kill people - so much for "individual rights" allowing the individual to take precedence over the group, as I've already pointed out.
There was one confirmed incident where local officials had someone welded into their home - the others are various online claims being parroted without evidence.
Yes, though it's all over the world, America included.
Look at the Patriot Act, or the NSA's monitoring of phone calls without court orders.
Not quite sure what your first sentence means.
No need for enforcement - if one wants change, one needs to go out and vote.
But these are voted on by Congress or state legislatures, not the average citizens in referenda.
Then if they don't want change, they need to get out and vote "No".
Instead of trying to insult someone why don't you simply explain wouldn't that be easier? Wouldn't that be lead directly more to what I think you presumably want which is to argue the point? Wouldn't that be a better use of your time?
No that is my local range. I was the RSO on duty at the time. Guy chambered .300blk in a 556 pistol. This is the result. Guy was lucky he didn't catch brass fragmentation.
This is irrelevant my point is that anything contrary to your argument you don't look into. You don't even see the other side of the story until someone sticks it directly under your nose.
Covered above because you missed the point.
Ok then why contest my statement on this when you already agree that those in the medical field challenge or distrust the vaccines in anyway? You already agreed very few do why not simply say that right from the jump?
How about because something untested and many reports of problems with the vaccines warrants further investigation. We have NO IDEA what the long term effects of the vaccine is. My knowledge of cysts, people dying near to them receiving the vaccine, people catching Covid after they get the vaccine etc. Seems like knowing what the effects of medicine you are injecting into yourself would be important no? Thus the testing.
Think of FDA approval as quality assurance. Other medications are tested far longer and therefore there are lists of known side effects these vaccines have unknowns and knowns. Reports of deaths and other issues associated with them makes me concerned given the rate of death associated with Corona virus plus the absolutely tom foolery considering the possibility of dying or being harmed from a VACCINE.
This doesn't cover all vaccines. Even still there are chances of medical staff using dirty needles, wrong types of needles, needles which have an allergic reaction associated with them in certain people. All of which I simply don't want to risk or deal with considering the chances of critical condition brought about by Covid it is a fraction of a fraction of a percent. Why take all the extra risks and then maybe or maybe not the Vaccine (and/or transmission variables) does something worse? It isn't worth it especially on something not as tested as anything else and granted emergency approval not standardized testing.
If I honestly have to explain this you have lost the point entirely. Why should I take the extra risk?
That is a huge asterisk. It highly depends on the vaccine and your specific physiology. It also depends on other factors not related to the vaccine. I am healthy now and the odds are hilariously low on dying from Covid. So unless things get more drastic and say the illness goes to 90% transmission rate and 90% chance of death or hospitalization or some such I don't consider the vaccine or the ways to get it to be worth it. So not worth in fact.
One is WORSE one is BETTER. Is it better to test an unknown longer or shorter? Longer right?
Didn't I start the argument that there shouldn't be mandates? If you agree there shouldn't be mandates then don't say anything. Don't complicate the argument if you don't disagree.
Well you missed multiple points I made so what's the difference?
So, you quote me saying exactly that, take a screenshot of you also saying exactly that and claim that I have a problem with reading comprehension? Hilarious and ironic. Again, please work on your reading comprehension. This is getting very sad. In addition, you missed my point completely again.
Obviously if you cite Texas law and I live in a different state then am I obligated to follow that law or am I going to be punished under that law? No. Then it is entirely irrelevant what I may do and what a resident of a different state may do given the statute or federal law. It is highly dependent on locale.
Ugh fine. I mostly only care about doxxing when it comes to my job. I don't want to levy a bunch of disclaimers.In one of your posts, you accidentally "doxed" yourself (
Although you also mentioned Knoxville, there's one in North Texas founded by people from Tennessee.
To be fair, you also said, "when I used to live in Texas", so I'm not sure which statement was true, and which a diversion. Perhaps you work in Texas, and live in Tennessee!?
If you like, I can pull the relevant laws/ordinances for TN.
Ah but you unrival your own point. If people complain enough I am sure something will be done to what degree though remains to be seen. Even with posted law currently in my locale it is largely unenforced. Do you really think police are going to show when violent crime is so high and those calls take priority? I don't see cops on a regular basis. They don't enforce speed limits. They don't show promptly when I reported firearms stolen when intercepting them at an FFL in order to give trade in value. They show to more important things if at all considering the number of police still being police and the number of new recruits to replace them. Remember after the verdict relating to George Floyd there were RECORD retirements, quittings and transferrings in the U.S. considering law enforcement. It is more difficult to replenish police and get the man hours to simply be a and operate as a cop. You can claim the law all you want but the reality of enforcement is yet another thorn in your side regarding this argument. The law says I need to have my vehicle registration up to date and yet I see people's tags expired by months and months.
statute section 9.42 stipulates time and place.
Ditto above.
Yes I am literally arguing such statutes aren't absolute. There are constraints to sound level, locality and purpose.
We have no magistrates it is Sherriff if in county and Police Department if in city.
Regardless, whether you live or merely work somewhere, if you breach ordinances/laws relating to noise and/or disorderly conduct, said laws will apply to you.
So ... does that mean you work in Texas and live in Tennessee or vice versa?
If the local force is undermanned then I understand how things might be currently, though I'm sure before all the "defund the police", etc, happenings, things were different.
It's also possible that because there's only a nominal $500 fine (at least in Texas) that they might not be seen as particularly important.
OK.
In fact, we have very good ideas about the long-term effects of the virus, including neurotropism, Lewy bodies indicating Parkinson's and other dementia disorders, changes in blood morphology not unlike sickle cell, autoimmune, chronic fatigue, ocular degeneration.