Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
"The PM saw off a bid to remove her government from power by 325 to 306 votes, the day after her plan for leaving the EU was rejected."
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46901217
Funny thing is that they reject her deal, but they don't seem to be in any hurry to oust her. This might be the...
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."
- Charles Darwin
Sure this is derailment, but I have to wonder what countries allow on demand abortion at 7 months? I live in a country where the limit is 12 weeks, 3 months for "on demand" (still need a reason and a doctors reference for it, but that's basically a byrocratic formality) abortion and 20 weeks for...
Re: Every non painted/photoshpped picture proves earth is fl
Yes I know I could have used this EPIC* picture:
But that is a NASA one, and as we all know NASA is a part of the Round Earth conspiracy in it's totality so I thought a Russian source would at least not be NASA.
*Earth...
Re: Every non painted/photoshpped picture proves earth is fl
Here with a nice zoomable version: http://gigapan.com/gigapans/103187
I mean I'm sure Bernie will dismiss that one too with some asinine excuse but I though some of you might get a kick out of it. That is, originally, a humongous...
Does anyone else have a problem decryphering that Bernie is trying to say? That because atheists can't prove a negative his God exists? Because he can prove a negative and atheists can't his God exists? That he doesn't understand the statement "you can't prove a negative" and therefore his God...
As a little side note it seems I have to say this again: The Gospels, or Pauls letters (those that are not forgeries or misattributions), are not evidence for the claim, they are the claim.
I'm not sure why we get into the historicity of Jesus again. That thing has it's own thread.
Also:
So...
I think you miss the point. It's not that Paul, James, Peter, John etc actually had a meeting and decided that they really should invent a myth for the purpose to free the Jews from Roman rule. It's just what they came up with over time as their view on Jesus and his teachings as they knew them...