• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Recent content by Rando

  1. R

    Arguments for God's Existence

    Oh good, more regurgitated Craig nonsense. The problem with regurgitating Craig is, none of his arguments are all that good. They don't have any demonstrable evidence behind them and they don't even argue exclusively for the christian god. Craig simply tacks on "and therefore the christian go is...
  2. R

    The League of Reason's Quack of the Year 2016 Submissions

    Re: The League of Reason's Quack of the Year 2016 Submission I know how low brow it is to pick an obvious candidate but I nominate Andrew Wakefield. He is directing a "documentary" based on his lies, and it is going to get a dvd release. I think he's relevant because it's 2016 and he is still...
  3. R

    The Magical/Miraculous origin of sex!

    If you want to talk about the origins of sex I would highly recommend Lithodidman's series on it. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3958DE95835B24A5 nP7EBESQTQY&list=PL3958DE95835B24A5&index=1
  4. R

    The Elshamah mega-thread

    Re: Proteintransport into Mitochondria is irreducible comple Why does the universe need a cause? You already believe that there is a thing that exists that doesn't have a cause, your god, so why does the universe need a cause? You also believe in a infinite being, your god again, so why can't...
  5. R

    The Elshamah mega-thread

    Re: Proteintransport into Mitochondria is irreducible comple Memes can be fun!
  6. R

    Discussion thread for Bernhard.visscher vs. hackenslash

    And yet again Bernie uses the information canard, shamelessly dishonest shit-weasel is all he can be.
  7. R

    Discussion thread for Bernhard.visscher vs. hackenslash

    Bernie is still talking about increasing complexity? Can I be a part of the betting? I'll go all in on "no new information!" Of course Bernie has also stated that he doesn't know how to measure it and that evolution can make it increase naturally, so in order to use it now, he'd have to be a...
  8. R

    The Design of the Simplest Self-Replicator

    I'm still waiting for that measurement of "information." No one at the Dishonesty Institute has EVER produced the method for measuring it, and this is arguably one of their most testable claims, you'd think they would have no problem producing it.
  9. R

    Discussion thread for Bernhard.visscher vs. hackenslash

    Some of my favorite of Bernie's greatest hits are Lying about the Google definition of Macro-evolution. Admitting to not knowing how to measure "information," but still claiming that evolution can't make it increase. And my favorite complaining about "assumptions" of evolution but avoiding...
  10. R

    Is evolution a fact?

    Okay Bernie, one "assumption" of evolution is that all organisms on this planet share a genetic history, the idea that all animals, plants and single celled creatures are all genetically connected. If however the creation orchard model is correct animals, plants and single celled organisms were...
  11. R

    Is evolution a fact?

    Okay Bernie, one way we know that our assumptions are accurate is through practical application. We can test the assumption that isotope will break down at a constant rate by developing nuclear energy and radioactive chemotherapy (something I work with). Both nuclear energy and chemotherapy...
  12. R

    DNA information

    See Momo, this is how you can tell you're dealing with creationist dishonesty. If you want to know what kind of "information" your dealing with in a conversation, simply ask for a formula. I'm sure HackandSlash or one of the other posters could demonstrate this, but, if you ask about Kolmogorov...
  13. R

    Evidence for/against YEC

    Okay, let me make a drive by comment Bernie will no doubt ignore... First off, you do NOT have a complete copy of the original bible, in it's original language. The King James or New Translation, or whatever version you think is legit is not the complete edition of the bible in it's original...
  14. R

    Is evolution a fact?

    And once again he gives us the "information" canard, but no metric for measuring it. How do you know this isn't an increase in "information" when you refuse to provide the metric for it?
  15. R

    Is evolution a fact?

    How about you provide us with your metric for "information?" Give us the step by step calculations for "information." I know I'm not the only one who wants it...
Back
Top