Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
Ugh. tedwomen. as if they're actually trying to highlight some kind of difference...
I mean I get that they're trying to talk about issues more relevant to women, or spearheaded by the ladies. But something about targetting the audience, thinking that men wouldn't be interested in the topics...
I don't know if there's anything I would accept as evidence for a "god", to be completely honest. Because evidence would have to be something "natural" and their claim about god is that it at least has an element of the supernatural, which is what I'm more concerned about.
But the point is. If...
This is probably the best debate I've seen the Hitch in. And I've seen quite a number of them.
Sometimes Hitch wouldn't address the point of his opponents and talks instead about what he wants to which to me is a cop-out. He didn't do that here and destroyed Blair, who had only one point to make.
Wheee. More strawmen. I wonder where all the straw is coming from.
Nobody said that you're not allowed to define your own views. You're perfectly well within your rights to do so - which is exactly why this discussion happened in the first place. If you weren't allowed your own views, then why...
Still complaining, I see.
Let me correct you on a few things, not that it'd matter to you since you barely know how to read.
1) The thread is entitled "see someone try to defend creationism honestly". The integrity on the line is yours, or whichever creationist tries to. So far, it seems like...
You're right. We have no clue about what information you have, since you haven't presented hardly ANY evidence due to no fault of anyone but yourself.
You're right in that you can define words to mean whatever the hell you want them to mean. But it doesn't mean that the rest of the world will...
Wait, are we even taking about evidence yet? I come back to this thread and it's still talking about definitions and No True Scotsman. Can anyone point me somewhere where Dotoree had presented some evidence....??
Oh.. wait... He's talking about MMORPGs? For crying out loud. This is such a yawnfest.
Re: A simple proposition to save a lot of people a lot of ti
I nearly shat meself laughing. Kudos, sir.
On topic:
I'm iffy on the issue of having the various arguments and standard responses stickied. Like others said, I hope it won't turn into copypasta. I think it's best for each...
Aught, here's the difference between you, me, and these people.
We don't vote based on preposterous facts. We are suspicious of things that sound so outlandish that we'll actually look for other sources. If something really mattered to me enough to vote for, I'll actually go check all sources...