Recent content by MarsCydonia

I've actually encountered "homogametic is female and thus inexorably "she" and heterogametic is male and thus inexorably "he".

One of the cultural issues of the day appear to be the acceptance of transgender individuals and what to accept when it comes to this issue, with a multitude of opinion from the pleas of acceptance, to their rejection, to the boogeyman of "state-enforced pronouns" to people exposing it for the...

Whataboutism is a very serious disease that, if left untreated, will lead to people considering you a complete joke.

What couldn't you understand about "another thread"? You can see where your absolutism gets you there.

Shouldn't this happen on another thread? There, leroy can explain why it is wrong to kill an innocent human by explaining what will certainly be 12 different definitions of "innocent" and even more excuses about why the christian god is said to have slaughtered so many of them.

Tree started a thread with an issue he is "concerned" by but actually used it to launch a barely-attached-to-reality attack on people he dislikes?

Arrogant, bigoted, hateful, cruel... An eternity with those who are convinced they will be in heaven sounds like hell.

But I was talking about short and simple answers... Which you've yet again failed to understand. If we can count on something, it's your consistency Leroy. It isn't just "long and ambiguous answers" that leave the door open to move from one position to another. Dishonest questions and...

It is simple. What you find hard is understanding simple and direct answers when they have more than 1 word. Case in point: Why is your answer NO? Aren't you just asserting NO out of your personal incredulity? Think about your comments on the previous page before you answer Leroy. Maybe...

It's one thing if you're back to defend slavery Bernhard but how long do you believe the moderators will tolerate your trolling before you are suspended yet again? Can you not even try to act as Christians claim they're supposed to act?

What a way to run Leroy. You're still running from Master_Ghost_Knightand he_who_is_nobody and my comment was highlighting how you've failed to address "every single of those points (multiple times in some cases". :lol: Except for the "So do you believe that the half-eaten cake could have...

Except, just for the hell of it, I will point out that "efficient" appears nowhere in the premises. Disagree with me? Of course, you're Leroy, committed to the your misunderstanding of the argument! You won't listen to anyone here but perhaps you'll listen to William Lane Craig himself? So...

The problem is that it still takes to longer to expose b.s. than it takes to spew it, doesn't it? With your history of comments Leroy, do you expect any benefit of the doubt? This is complete b.s., for the reason explained and which you ignored plus the fact that I would dumb down the point by...

You're not helping yourself Leroy. You didn't ask Master_Ghost_Knight to clarify the content, you asserted he was making an "argument" from personal incredulity. Let's if we can dumb it down for you Leroy: It we see a half-eaten cake, can the person that ate the cake be a married bachelor?

So the answer is a "No". Not because Leroy does not want to but because Leroy does not understand the content.