• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Recent content by IrBubble

  1. I

    I DARE ANY atheists answer my simple Question !!!!

    @ waza I find it fairly funny that you are trying to make a definition to atheism that very few atheists agree to. I could do the same with muslims. Muslim: Subjective. Someone who believes in fairytales. And even if I were to argue wholeheartedly that this was the proper definition it does...
  2. I

    The Truth about the ACTA could put it in its grave

    That's not quite what iJoe wrote though, he said that the solution was for people to stop stealing, not for anyone preventing people to steal.
  3. I

    Pseudoscience... Why I Hate the Term

    Both computer science and enviromental science are valid fields. Enviromental science is a subset of physics and chemistry, just like computer science is applied boolean math. Arguing semantics over applicability is just silly in my opinion.
  4. I

    Global Warming

    Seriously Niocan? You're making the argument that because we don't have perfect knowlage we should never speak on any topic? Do you have anything to support this claim? CO2 is a greenhouse gas. If you increase how much greenhouse gases there are in the atmosphere you will increase the...
  5. I

    Favorite Game(s)?

    That's my lifetime game statistics, that's what's pathetic. When I used to play wow that was a full time none profit job ;)
  6. I

    The Truth about the ACTA could put it in its grave

    The case might be that the industry thrives due to the "free" downloading in the case of music, but as far as my experience goes the consumation of music is very different to the consumation of movies, where the movies are only being watched once or twice on avrage, while you avragely listen...
  7. I

    Four Agnostics

    The question might have been stated poorly, but it was supposed to be a question about the gnosticism of a monotheistic god (which I interpreted your position to have a belief in). Yes ofcourse. I'm not asking for specifics, just for your beliefs on the matter. The question should be more like...
  8. I

    ** STICKY ** Caption Contest

    Caption: DUKE NUKEM SHOVE IT UP YOUR ASS!
  9. I

    Favorite Game(s)?

    Very much of my toplist might come due to nostalgia, but here it is anyyways: -1 I'm born in 1990 so FFVII -2 Diablo 2, level 88 amazon HC ftw ;) (I cried when it died). -3 Halo -4 Half Life 2 -5 Fallout 1-2 -6 WoW TBC (the PvP is the only part I cared for in the game) -7 TF2 -8 Portals (This...
  10. I

    TF2

    yes :3
  11. I

    ** STICKY ** LoR Steam group

    I both agree and disagree with this. I complain (mostly to myself) about some classes when playing on public servers, for instance engineers when stacked (three or more) are extremely hard to take down without cooperating, which in itself is very hard to achieve on public servers. So they are...
  12. I

    Four Agnostics

    So, basically you're saying that absolute knowlage is impossible for man, am I right? That would be the agnostic position in the way that we use it here. So, would you say that the same applies to a diety, or is it a trait only we have. And if it's only humanity, do you believe that we could...
  13. I

    Lets play a game.

    Actaully, is from that entry, according to which you should announce you lost the game rather than announce that we lost the game, as you cannot possibly know if I thought of the game or the game specified by the OP. Btw, I just lost the game.
  14. I

    The Truth about the ACTA could put it in its grave

    The evidence is to me pretty trivial, we can take the downloading of copyrighted materials. I hope I do not have to find sources to back up that people do download for instance movies. They enjoy the movies, thus they download it, but because they are unwilling to pay for the movies the movies...
  15. I

    Four Agnostics

    The paradox he was pointing out was that if it's impossible to have a 100% certain knowlage, how do you know that nobody has it? You cannot support the premise because it's a paradox, either you know something a 100%, which disproves the argument, or you do not know it 100%, and you can't make...
Back
Top