Recent content by evilotakuneko

I guess that explains why babies go to hell? :lol:

Of course the ontological argument proves God's existence. It proves his existence as a fictional character in a storybook. :D See, fictitious characters exist both in the mind--of the author and the reader--and in reality--as part of the book! The ontological argument just has it backward...

"When are we going to have a labeling system that says these weapons are for hunting wild game and these weapons have no legitimate purpose except for self defense" Um, because pretty much any gun can be used for both? Some are better at one or the other purpose but there's nothing stopping you...

First, I know most of you probably hate Pat Condell even more than you hate Thunderf00t. Second, linkification: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQ3KOZCM91c I've remained subscribed to Condell even after realizing he was full of shit because I actually find entertainment value in his videos. I...

Money of course! They've all got investments in "green" companies and things like that! I'm sure some of them even invested in Solyndra! Oh wait... :lol: /NotReallyAnAGWDenier

Y'know what, I'm gonna add this here, even though the guy claimed to not be a creationist. It's actually stupider than anything any creationist said in that thread. Wat.

Must've missed that page entirely when I checked.

It's easy to see his side in his video. On the other hand, the simplistic "don't be a jerk" rule may well be insufficient in a legal sense. C0nc0rdance also weighed in on the issue recently. I don't think he's aware of the level of hate being directed at Thunderf00t....

I think that's probably a fair assessment. I couldn't help but be unsure of his actual position since, as I showed in my last post to him, he kept using the exact same arguments creationists do, not to mention his constant dismissal of any and all evidence presented to him. I doubt showing him...

Pretty sure I did have links to potholer in the post I referred him back to. However, it's all pretty much moot. He ran off.

Ohai League of Reason. On one of the forums I spend time on, evolution "debates" crop up once in a while. Usually it's a comedy of pwnage as idiot creatards show up to take their licks. Sometimes, you get one who is weak in their belief, only a creationist out of ignorance. Sometimes they seem...

Who expects intelligent conversation in youtube comments?

I've often wondered if Jesus is perhaps a composite character, an amalgam of some number of actual people. A middle eastern Paul Bunyan, if you will.

They could likely get a similar benefit from just doing something regularly together.

For he so loved the world, he condemned vast numbers of its inhabitants to eternal torture for no other reason than using the brains he himself gave them.