• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Recent content by Call Me Emo

  1. Call Me Emo

    Hovind series ep21

    Actually they have provided methods by which they identify and distinguish between "Kinds".... It's just that the results end up undermining the argument they're trying to make. So instead of "Kinds" being evidently unrelated, they end up being nearly indistinguishable. Showing some...
  2. Call Me Emo

    Hovind series ep21

    Not sure if this would be of any use to AronRa or if he's even going to see this, but I think it would help if he's aware of the extent of biodiversity Creationists already accept within "Kinds" to show that they clearly accept that Macroevolution happens. Baraminology and Grafting...
  3. Call Me Emo

    Explaining Macroevolution to a creationist

    That's a strong possibility
  4. Call Me Emo

    Explaining Macroevolution to a creationist

    To be fair, Creationists actually do attempt to identify "created kinds", however, it ends up often looking like this [1] whenever you compare a "Kind" to the "Kinds" closest to them, which undermines the argument they're trying to make. A better question would be, what is preventing the...
  5. Call Me Emo

    Explaining Macroevolution to a creationist

    Oh complexity certainly can increase
  6. Call Me Emo

    Explaining Macroevolution to a creationist

    I'm happy to be welcomed
  7. Call Me Emo

    Explaining Macroevolution to a creationist

    Knowing that creationists (YECs) already accept Macroevolution, I fail to see why they can never understand it. Baraminology and Grafting Compatibility in Plants, 2020: [citations within link]
  8. Call Me Emo

    Concerns on Casey's Calculations

    Written by: Emotionally Stunted Emoticon In an article from Evolutionnews.org [2], Casey Luskin of the Discovery Institute attempted to critique a 2010 paper on the evolution of Antifreeze in Antarctic Eelpouts [1]. Although numerous claims were made throughout the article, I'll be focusing on...
  9. Call Me Emo

    The Onion DNA Similarity Test For Creationists

    The test is not for you to ask me questions. Just take the test or leave it alone.
  10. Call Me Emo

    The Onion DNA Similarity Test For Creationists

    Are you going to take the challenge or what??
  11. Call Me Emo

    A Long Story of Misunderstandings and Futility & An Invitation to "Long Story Short"

    That's the same thing I try to explain to Creationists all the time. But because they don't understand the significance of Phylogenies, they don't understand the significance of the argument.
  12. Call Me Emo

    The Onion DNA Similarity Test For Creationists

    Written by: Emotionally Stunted Emoticon Creationists tend to argue that the 98.5 percent DNA similarity between Humans and Chimps is a myth [9]. They argue this by pointing out several "anomalies" in the comparison such as Chimps having an 11.5% larger genome to Humans [2], and the fact...
  13. Call Me Emo

    Proving evolution to someone who doesn't believe anything

    You're beginning to play with me. The paper clearly describes not only that the plants are all variants of the same species, but also describes how they were cultivated to look the way they look. Do you accept the fact that these plants are related? If not, give reasons for your answer and...
  14. Call Me Emo

    Proving evolution to someone who doesn't believe anything

    Is that all the information you got from the citation?
  15. Call Me Emo

    Proving evolution to someone who doesn't believe anything

    I've already given you evidence, but apparently it isn't enough. But what "evidence" are you really looking for though? Do you want me to show you a banana tree not reverting back into its wild type form? What would you expect the evidence to be or look like? I'm trying my best to give you...
Back
Top