When theists are criticised for failing to provide evidence for their views, many are quick to respond that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". As catchy as this slogan might sound, I am afraid it is fallacious in the highest degree. In order to discuss this we need to define...
I doubt they were being serious to be honest. One of them was at The Amazing Meeting once and the other one stated his religion as "Flying Spagetti Monster". They are probably just taking the piss.
This is an idea I am working on. It is not done yet, but it would be great if you could help me finish it by commenting. When it is done I will post it as a video on my youtube channel. (http://www.youtube.com/agnosticantitheist)
Here is the text so far: This video is largely based on Richard...