Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The link doesnt work!Keeping out of the way, but I highly recommend Potholer's series. it's often a little bit behind the curve because he's busy and he's properly rigorous, but he's the best source for dealing with the bullshit by far.
I wrote a short piece about the detailed physics of climate energy budgets, i.e., exactly how absorption works, etc.
Dying By Degrees
So, apparently, Donald Trump doesn't believe a report released by his own administration. That's his prerogative, of course, but he ...www.hackenslash.co.uk
I have a piece in the works that treats AGW more comprehensively. I have to say that individual events being claimed as unequivocally a result of climate change is a new thing in my experience, but it's not like we haven't known for some time that there was going to be such an event before much longer.
We also now have unambiguous measurements showing that insolation exceeds radiation, which is the smoking gun of all smoking guns. Then there's the first objective measurement of the balance at the Northern terminator of AMOC, just in time to tell us it's right in the critical region for cut-off (I discuss the mechanism for that in the linked post) and that it could happen at any time.
The crisis is upon us, and all that's left is the reverberation of 'I told you so'.
I get a weird web page thats in German which I can not fully understand. I hope all is well with him.Greetings,
Somewhat concerning - clicking on the "My Witterings" link results in a page saying "Blog has been removed".
Is Hack alright?
Kindest regards,
James
I'm guessing there must be like a computer generated climate model the politicians console before they go on TV and tell us how much danger we are in and what laws we need to protect us from the danger of climate change.
Is there a program I can download somewhere which has accurately predicted climate, say for the last 100 years? Retroactively, of course. Or for the last 50 years or whatever..
Sorry about that.The link doesnt work!
I presume you mean "scientists," not politicians.
By "laws" I assume you mean "regulations." There are thousands of them regarding CO2, NO2, CFC's emissions. It is a mystery to me why you believe that politicians should warn us of the crisis instead of the world's geophysicists who have been warning us since year 1856.
No, there is not "a program" for accurately projecting human-caused climate change: there are a dozen of them, and you would need a mainframe computer and space for billions of data points.
Fortunately you already have the correct projections, in spades. Even Hansen's 1980 projection is accurate. So was and is Exxon's projections.
You are welcome. Any thing else you wish to know? If so, get remedial high school chemistry classes.