• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Guns and Intent

  • Thread starter Deleted member 42253
  • Start date
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
The only citation you provided to me when I requested it. I guess context only matters when you are speaking.
What do you think a screencap of a law I am disputing is?
:rolleyes:

Reading comprehension is not your forte.
The only citation you provided to me when I requested it. I guess context only matters when you are speaking. [Emphasis added]
Perhaps the emphasis will help, but I doubt it.
 
arg-fallbackName="BoganUSAFFLClerk"/>
...the implication of nobody's statement being that they requested citation multiple times, and that the event in question is the only time you provided them with a citation that they requested.
His statement is vague. He should simply screencap so that there is context. Which SOURCES I didn't cite? His generic statement of I never cited anything isn't true.

There would be far less disputes and time wasting if people provided full context. Use screen caps it isn't hard.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
He should simply screencap so that there is context.

Nobody but you seems to need a screencap to be able to see context. And it's not like a screen cap actually offers context - it's got a border selected by the individual posting the screen cap, that border is editorially chosen.


There would be far less disputes and time wasting if people provided full context. Use screen caps it isn't hard.

I don't believe anyone considers it difficult - rather, they consider it completely unnecessary when you can just quote the post with the forum software. Given that you can use the forum software to quote what's said, it actually comes across as you having difficulties understanding either the forum software, or as it appears from the way you've used your screen caps, difficulty following the discussion. The full context is already here in the thread - no one else appears to find this a problem.
 
Last edited:
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
Literally no one requested the very first sources I posted to make my argument. Your statement isn't true.
:rolleyes:

Again, reading comprehension is not your forte.
His statement is vague.
No, it is not. In fact, someone else was able to get it. You are just obtuse.
He should simply screencap so that there is context.
Or you can learn how forums work, boomer.
Which SOURCES I didn't cite?
Here, and here. To name just a few.
His generic statement of I never cited anything isn't true.
:rolleyes:

Yet I did not say that now did I:
The only citation you provided to me when I requested it. I guess context only matters when you are speaking. [Emphasis added]
Stop being obtuse.
There would be far less disputes and time wasting if people provided full context. Use screen caps it isn't hard.
Or you can learn how to use a forum boomer.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
It's usually Creationists who can't figure out forum software and contrive these excessively blunt ways round just learning how forum software works. Funnily, they usually don't grasp discussion either, can't acknowledge errors, and are motivated to locate those they perceive as being their ideological enemies to proselytize at.
 
arg-fallbackName="BoganUSAFFLClerk"/>
Nobody but you seems to need a screencap to be able to see context. And it's not like a screen cap actually offers context - it's got a border selected by the individual posting the screen cap, that border is editorially chosen.
Not when the Forum Software doesn't work properly. The snipping tool is far more reliable and easier to use. Yes editorially chosen to illustrate the specific context you are trying to convey.
I don't believe anyone considers it difficult - rather, they consider it completely unnecessary when you can just quote the post with the forum software. Given that you can use the forum software to quote what's said, it actually comes across as you having difficulties understanding either the forum software, or as it appears from the way you've used your screen caps, difficulty following the discussion. The full context is already here in the thread - no one else appears to find this a problem.
Never the less I have constant issues with the forum software. I already uploaded and screenshot of me muting Hackenslash and the mute not working. I wouldn't have that evidence or CONTEXT if I didn't screenshot it now would I? Remember that?
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
Not when the Forum Software doesn't work properly.

As I just said: it works fine. Your ability to use it properly notwithstanding.

Never the less I have constant issues with the forum software.

Your issues are not shared. Therefore you have a simple explanation as to why other people don't need to use screen caps.
 
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
Never the less I have constant issues with the forum software. I already uploaded and screenshot of me muting Hackenslash and the mute not working. I wouldn't have that evidence or CONTEXT if I didn't screenshot it now would I? Remember that?
You have to keep that bubble big.
:rolleyes:

So you post something that is out of date to serve as your citation? As if anyone expected anything else.
 
arg-fallbackName="BoganUSAFFLClerk"/>
You have to keep that bubble big.
I posted a screenshot of the mute/ignore feature not working find that screenshot as proof.
So you post something that is out of date to serve as your citation? As if anyone expected anything else.
The U.S. hasn't changed the voting very much. It is very small small changes but pretty much the same logistics and process sort of like background checks/4473s.

Address the argument the voting system in the U.S. is highly inaccurate therefore NOT trustworthy end of argument.
 
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
I posted a screenshot of the mute/ignore feature not working find that screenshot as proof.
Again, reading comprehension is not your forte.
The U.S. hasn't changed the voting very much. It is very small small changes but pretty much the same logistics and process sort of like background checks/4473s.
Citation needed.
Address the argument the voting system in the U.S. is highly inaccurate therefore NOT trustworthy end of argument.
Your argument is based on old data.
 
arg-fallbackName="Dragan Glas"/>
Greetings,

HWIN, the reason why Bogan referred to me as the "first left" is undoubtedly because he doesn't perceive you as on the left - he certainly appears to be unaware of your post in the "Political Spectrum" thread. [1]

Kindest regards,

James
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
Are you the first left? I thought that was Albuquerque... or bacon... I guess I wasn't specifically looking out specifically for lefties specifically! ;)
 
Back
Top