Dragan Glas
Well-Known Member
Greetings,
It's not a definition of "God", or a argument as to why you think a creator is "in the lead" as a explanation for biodiversity.
As such, your answer is off-topic.
Again - as with the other thread - it seems you can't answer a direct question posed to you.
Kindest regards,
James
This is an argument from ignorance as to why you don't accept evolution - or, why evolution is not "in the lead".Because I don't think that universal common ancestry is possible and or probable. I don't believe that one living organism became all the others in small increments over vast amounts of time. I don't think that random errors would change an ape like ancestor into a human being. We are too advanced too different.
Sure we are made of the same biological materials. However , chimps and humans allegedly came from this ancestor. One can speak , read, write, drive cars, build cities, perform surgery and explore space. The other is running around the jungle throwing and eating its own feces.
It's not a definition of "God", or a argument as to why you think a creator is "in the lead" as a explanation for biodiversity.
As such, your answer is off-topic.
Again - as with the other thread - it seems you can't answer a direct question posed to you.
Kindest regards,
James