They're used for suppressive fire, right? I'm not crazy?
Spray and pray. Put out that much flying metal and you're bound to damage something!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're used for suppressive fire, right? I'm not crazy?
Yeah, he's firing blanks here.What you need to do is to think about your poor argumentation.
Ohoho!Yeah, he's firing blanks here.
Yes seriously. It's one of the most popular rifles used for large game like deer.AR-15 ... for hunting .. seriously?
And there it is.Nah, not gonna bother with this anymore ... seems pointless when you have people that argue that guns are not meant for killing people and then go full on Apocalypse Now.
There just does not seem to be anything useful in the point you are trying to make. Im an American. Lets say I buy gun, specifically for the purpose of killing someone who breaks into my home at night and tries to kill me or my family. The very next week someone breaks into my house and tries to kill me and I shoot him dead.Nah, not gonna bother with this anymore ... seems pointless when you have people that argue that guns are not meant for killing people and then go full on Apocalypse Now.
And there it is.
Your assessment of the thread is as woefully inadequate as your initial argument.
You began the thread with an assertion that 'guns have only one purpose'. When that was challenged, you asked for a list of other purposes, despite the fact that your own argument contained the concession of your entire position without you even having the logical chops to realise it. When provided with a list of falsifying examples that utterly crushed your preposterously overstated case, you attempted to poison the well by morphing objections to your asinine statement into support for the negation of your position, which is a whole litany of fallacies in only a few words.
You don't get to play the martyr card because you said something stupid and quite rightly had it ripped to pieces. It's pathetic, and easily spotted by anybody with even a rudimentary understanding of logic and discursive tactics. I've seen precision optical lenses that were harder to see through than you.
There just does not seem to be anything useful in the point you are trying to make. Im an American. Lets say I buy gun, specifically for the purpose of killing someone who breaks into my home at night and tries to kill me or my family. The very next week someone breaks into my house and tries to kill me and I shoot him dead.
Then you come and say what? What happens next?
Bzzzzzzzz. Thank you for playing. In this case, you erected an absolute statement that could brook no contradiction; a true binary statement. Any falsifying observation renders the statement false. It's as simple as that.Yes Hacken, exceptions exists and by no means invalidate the point.
None of these is a statement on the same logical footing as 'guns have only one purpose'. The key bit of that is 'only one', which is an absolute that cannot countenance alternatives. This is a simple principle of logic which, given that you clearly don't get it, is a nice commentary on your competence to render a logical assessment of anything.People shouldnt screw around with explosives, still, some people get to work with explosives. People should not have access to Plutonium, still, some people get to work with Plutonium.
I can demonstrate that you have no credibility to make such an assessment.Thats in no way irrational or illogical.
"The average joe has no business owning a gun" is a contention that you might actually be able to argue.Yes Hacken, exceptions exists and by no means invalidate the point.
People shouldnt screw around with explosives, still, some people get to work with explosives. People should not have access to Plutonium, still, some people get to work with Plutonium.
Thats in no way irrational or illogical.
I have no problem with demonstrably responsible people owning firearms for all sorts of reasons. I have a problem with unrestricted access, largely because I have a problem with the resultant societal problems.
Oh, woe is me.Yes hacken, I have no credibility at all. I am incredible.
Really? I've already been shot at twice before with real bullets by real people who were trying to kill me. Once I was actually inside my home but they were shooting from the outside so I guess that doesnt count.Then I come and tell you, that no one is gonna break into your house to kill you. Thats an irrational fear.